Condi Rice and Laura Bush support Sodomite Mark Dybul

This is just too much to pass up but at the same time it makes one almost speechless.  Here is the deal, there was a swearing in ceremony on October 10th, for the next Global AIDS Coordinator, Mark Dybul.  Stop!  Why do we have a GLOBAL AIDS anything?  Why are my tax dollars paying someones salary to A) fight AIDS “globally“, and B) fight AIDS anywhere?  That is a legitimate constitutional concern.  But there’s more.
I know its a shock but the Global AIDS Coordinator is a sodomite and has a live in “Partner”, which our tax dollars will now be supporting.  Actually they have been supporting them both since they were already living off the tax payers of the land as AIDS “researchers”.  But now we are supporting him with an Ambassadors salary and position!  This is a legitimate moral concern.  My conscience objects to supporting sodomites with money I earn.  Secondly the principles of justice cry out as they are trampled in the streets of our nation as money that should be going to support my family and causes I believe in are being sent to Washington, DC and being used to support an agenda and it’s people that is absolutely antithetical to my beliefs.  Who is forcing who’s beliefs on who in this scenario?
Next, we need to understand the Republicrats are not the good guys!  This is happening under a Republican “conservative” so called “Christian” president.  We’ll you say, “but maybe he didn’t really know.  I mean he’s a busy guy and has a lot on his hands in the Middle East.  He vested the authority in Condi Rice and she did it under the radar… you know, shes the liberal of the crowd.”  That in itself would not fly as one is responsible for what happens under their watch, but sadly that is not even the case.  Laura Bush, the presidents own wife, was standing on the platform giving moral support from the White House because she is such “a tireless advocate” for this program.


Wait, it gets better.  Secretary of State Rice actually referred to the Sodomite’s Partner’s mother as his, “mother-in-law”.  It’s funny, but it seems like we just had a newspaper, make this same “mistake”.  If you want to force people to accept sodomite marriages then start using the terminology as if it was already acceptable.  I predict you will begin to hear more of this type of language in all manner of places.
Lastly, the true icing on the cake, is that Jason (sodomite number two) actually held the Bible for his “partner” while he was being sworn in!  That’s right, take another look at the picture.  They may have done it to mock Christians and try to give legitimacy to their sin.  But what they have done is mock the very God who created them.  They fail to realize that they only breathe their breath each day by His permission.  I don’t suspect they will be drawing that breath for much longer, based simply on the Holiness of God and the fact that His word says he is not mocked.  Or perhaps, since they and the others who participated in this mockery are representing the nation of America before the council of Heaven, perhaps we as a nation will not be around much longer.


  • Josiah (ironic, considering site) says:

    Anyone who works for the government lives off of tax payer’s dollars. He won the position, he gets it. He also pays tax ollars you know. It’s the fair thing to do.

  • Josiah – I appreciate the comment. I disagree however, on two points.
    First, on a constitutional level, there is no constitutional legality to the agency.
    Secondly, on a Biblical level, sodomites are not qualified to hold office any more than one who commits adultery. In addition, to basic qualification issues, there is the notion that God judges nations based on their leaders.
    By definition a sodomite is at odds with God and under his judgement. Why would we invite that judgement upon our nation by placing someone who is A) unqualified and B) under the judgement of God in a place of leadership?
    BTW – it’s not about “fairness”, it is about justice.

  • Kevin says:

    Sadly, if this picture was Hillary Clinton and Madeline Albright, conservatives would be outraged. Rush Limbaugh would spend three hours blasting it and Matt Drudge would give a banner headline.
    But because this is ‘our’ administration, conservatives look the other way. It took years of voting Republican for our family to understand that Christians must vote for the man and not the party and leave the rest to God. This has made us very unpopular, even amoung our own family, but I can sleep at night knowing that we did not play a role in putting these sodomite-embracing “conservatives” in power.
    There ARE alternatives when it comes to voting for elected officials.

  • Kevin,
    Thanks for the comment. You are absolutely right. Our duty and our loyalty are only to God.
    Even the Constitution Party recently compromised on it’s once stellar pro-life position. We really have to vote for the person and insure we can stand before God with the choices we have made!

  • Josiah says:

    Paul. Christian differences aside, the bible has nothing to do with this. Not everyone who is in the government is a Christian, and actually some politicians who are Christians in the government end up doing very un-Christianlike things.
    Also, the man is fully qualified for this job.

  • Josiah,
    You hit on one of the important issues of this site. There is no such thing as “Christian” differences.
    There is what God’s says and then there is everything else. What God says, in his word – the Bible, is Christian. Everything else is some level of humanism.
    As to Christian’s “doing very unchristian like things”, see above. Being a Christian is not what you say or if you go in a building every now and then that has a cross on or around it. Being a Christian, is obeying the word of God!
    Not perfectly, Christians make mistakes like everyone, but there are some basic, fairly large issues or actions that a “Christian” will not do. Adultery, Sodomy, theft, murder, etc.. these are things that would pretty much exclude a man from being called a Christian according to Romans 1 among other places.
    Many people in this nation today call themselves Christians today. The real question is what does God call them?
    1 Corinthians 6:9-11 KJV
    (9) Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
    (10) Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
    (11) And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.
    A Christian is one who repents, i.e. turns away from the things they use to do and embraces the calling of Christ. So with this in mind Christians do not do unchristian like things. People who call themselves Christians might.

  • Here is a link to an article I just discovered, entitled, What is a Biblical Christian”, it seems like a timely discovery, so I thought I’d include the link.|31|62