﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Condi Rice and Laura Bush support Sodomite Mark Dybul</title>
	<link>http://vaughnshire.com/2006/10/24/condi-rice-and-laura-bush-support-sodomite-mark-dybul/</link>
	<description>A multi-generational vision for advancing the Kingdom of Christ</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Paul R. Vaughn</title>
		<link>http://vaughnshire.com/2006/10/24/condi-rice-and-laura-bush-support-sodomite-mark-dybul/#comment-226</link>
		<author>Paul R. Vaughn</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 04:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://vaughnshire.com/2006/10/24/condi-rice-and-laura-bush-support-sodomite-mark-dybul/#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Here is a link to an article I just discovered, entitled, What is a Biblical Christian", it seems like a timely discovery, so I thought I'd include the link.

http://www.graceonlinelibrary.org/articles/full.asp?id=31&#124;31&#124;62</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a link to an article I just discovered, entitled, What is a Biblical Christian&#8221;, it seems like a timely discovery, so I thought I&#8217;d include the link.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.graceonlinelibrary.org/articles/full.asp?id=31" >http://www.graceonlinelibrary.org/articles/full.asp?id=31</a>|31|62</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul R. Vaughn</title>
		<link>http://vaughnshire.com/2006/10/24/condi-rice-and-laura-bush-support-sodomite-mark-dybul/#comment-225</link>
		<author>Paul R. Vaughn</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 21:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://vaughnshire.com/2006/10/24/condi-rice-and-laura-bush-support-sodomite-mark-dybul/#comment-225</guid>
		<description>Josiah,

You hit on one of the important issues of this site.  There is no such thing as "Christian" differences.

There is what God's says and then there is everything else.  What God says, in his word - the Bible, is Christian.  Everything else is some level of humanism.

As to Christian's "doing very unchristian like things", see above.  Being a Christian is not what you say or if you go in a building every now and then that has a cross on or around it.  Being a Christian, is obeying the word of God!

Not perfectly, Christians make mistakes like everyone, but there are some basic, fairly large issues or actions that a "Christian" will not do.  Adultery, Sodomy, theft, murder, etc.. these are things that would pretty much exclude a man from being called a Christian according to Romans 1 among other places.

Many people in this nation today call themselves Christians today.  The real question is what does God call them?

1 Corinthians 6:9-11 KJV
(9)  Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
(10)  Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
(11)  And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.

A Christian is one who repents, i.e. turns away from the things they use to do and embraces the calling of Christ.  So with this in mind Christians do not do unchristian like things.  People who call themselves Christians might.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josiah,</p>
<p>You hit on one of the important issues of this site.  There is no such thing as &#8220;Christian&#8221; differences.</p>
<p>There is what God&#8217;s says and then there is everything else.  What God says, in his word - the Bible, is Christian.  Everything else is some level of humanism.</p>
<p>As to Christian&#8217;s &#8220;doing very unchristian like things&#8221;, see above.  Being a Christian is not what you say or if you go in a building every now and then that has a cross on or around it.  Being a Christian, is obeying the word of God!</p>
<p>Not perfectly, Christians make mistakes like everyone, but there are some basic, fairly large issues or actions that a &#8220;Christian&#8221; will not do.  Adultery, Sodomy, theft, murder, etc.. these are things that would pretty much exclude a man from being called a Christian according to Romans 1 among other places.</p>
<p>Many people in this nation today call themselves Christians today.  The real question is what does God call them?</p>
<p>1 Corinthians 6:9-11 KJV<br />
(9)  Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,<br />
(10)  Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.<br />
(11)  And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.</p>
<p>A Christian is one who repents, i.e. turns away from the things they use to do and embraces the calling of Christ.  So with this in mind Christians do not do unchristian like things.  People who call themselves Christians might.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josiah</title>
		<link>http://vaughnshire.com/2006/10/24/condi-rice-and-laura-bush-support-sodomite-mark-dybul/#comment-224</link>
		<author>Josiah</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 01:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://vaughnshire.com/2006/10/24/condi-rice-and-laura-bush-support-sodomite-mark-dybul/#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Paul. Christian differences aside, the bible has nothing to do with this. Not everyone who is in the government is a Christian, and actually some politicians who are Christians in the government end up doing very un-Christianlike things.

Also, the man is fully qualified for this job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul. Christian differences aside, the bible has nothing to do with this. Not everyone who is in the government is a Christian, and actually some politicians who are Christians in the government end up doing very un-Christianlike things.</p>
<p>Also, the man is fully qualified for this job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul R. Vaughn</title>
		<link>http://vaughnshire.com/2006/10/24/condi-rice-and-laura-bush-support-sodomite-mark-dybul/#comment-223</link>
		<author>Paul R. Vaughn</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 04:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://vaughnshire.com/2006/10/24/condi-rice-and-laura-bush-support-sodomite-mark-dybul/#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Kevin,

Thanks for the comment.  You are absolutely right.  Our duty and our loyalty are only to God.

Even the Constitution Party recently compromised on it's once stellar pro-life position.  We really have to vote for the person and insure we can stand before God with the choices we have made!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.  You are absolutely right.  Our duty and our loyalty are only to God.</p>
<p>Even the Constitution Party recently compromised on it&#8217;s once stellar pro-life position.  We really have to vote for the person and insure we can stand before God with the choices we have made!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://vaughnshire.com/2006/10/24/condi-rice-and-laura-bush-support-sodomite-mark-dybul/#comment-222</link>
		<author>Kevin</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://vaughnshire.com/2006/10/24/condi-rice-and-laura-bush-support-sodomite-mark-dybul/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>Sadly, if this picture was Hillary Clinton and Madeline Albright, conservatives would be outraged.  Rush Limbaugh would spend three hours blasting it and Matt Drudge would give a banner headline.

But because this is 'our' administration, conservatives look the other way.  It took years of voting Republican for our family to understand that Christians must vote for the man and not the party and leave the rest to God.  This has made us very unpopular, even amoung our own family, but I can sleep at night knowing that we did not play a role in putting these sodomite-embracing "conservatives" in power.

There ARE alternatives when it comes to voting for elected officials. www.constitutionparty.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, if this picture was Hillary Clinton and Madeline Albright, conservatives would be outraged.  Rush Limbaugh would spend three hours blasting it and Matt Drudge would give a banner headline.</p>
<p>But because this is &#8216;our&#8217; administration, conservatives look the other way.  It took years of voting Republican for our family to understand that Christians must vote for the man and not the party and leave the rest to God.  This has made us very unpopular, even amoung our own family, but I can sleep at night knowing that we did not play a role in putting these sodomite-embracing &#8220;conservatives&#8221; in power.</p>
<p>There ARE alternatives when it comes to voting for elected officials. <a href="http://www.constitutionparty.com" >www.constitutionparty.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul R. Vaughn</title>
		<link>http://vaughnshire.com/2006/10/24/condi-rice-and-laura-bush-support-sodomite-mark-dybul/#comment-221</link>
		<author>Paul R. Vaughn</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 03:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://vaughnshire.com/2006/10/24/condi-rice-and-laura-bush-support-sodomite-mark-dybul/#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Josiah - I appreciate the comment.  I disagree however, on two points.

First, on a constitutional level, there is no constitutional legality to the agency.

Secondly, on a Biblical level, sodomites are not qualified to hold office any more than one who commits adultery.  In addition, to basic qualification issues, there is the notion that God judges nations based on their leaders.

By definition a sodomite is at odds with God and under his judgement.  Why would we invite that judgement upon our nation by placing someone who is A) unqualified and B) under the judgement of God in a place of leadership?

BTW - it's not about "fairness", it is about justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josiah - I appreciate the comment.  I disagree however, on two points.</p>
<p>First, on a constitutional level, there is no constitutional legality to the agency.</p>
<p>Secondly, on a Biblical level, sodomites are not qualified to hold office any more than one who commits adultery.  In addition, to basic qualification issues, there is the notion that God judges nations based on their leaders.</p>
<p>By definition a sodomite is at odds with God and under his judgement.  Why would we invite that judgement upon our nation by placing someone who is A) unqualified and B) under the judgement of God in a place of leadership?</p>
<p>BTW - it&#8217;s not about &#8220;fairness&#8221;, it is about justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josiah (ironic, considering site)</title>
		<link>http://vaughnshire.com/2006/10/24/condi-rice-and-laura-bush-support-sodomite-mark-dybul/#comment-220</link>
		<author>Josiah (ironic, considering site)</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 02:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://vaughnshire.com/2006/10/24/condi-rice-and-laura-bush-support-sodomite-mark-dybul/#comment-220</guid>
		<description>Anyone who works for the government lives off of tax payer's dollars. He won the position, he gets it. He also pays tax ollars you know. It's the fair thing to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who works for the government lives off of tax payer&#8217;s dollars. He won the position, he gets it. He also pays tax ollars you know. It&#8217;s the fair thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
